Missionary Position

The mission of missionaries is to position themselves in another country, and infiltrate the natives, converting them to Christianity.

The missionary position is a sexual position only possible in heterosexual sex. The man and woman lie horizontal, face to face, the woman lying submissive on her back, the man crushing her on top.

The missionary position is laughed about as a joke, usually considered as some dull routine sexual position that is the only thing unimaginative missionary types can come up with.

But the missionary position has a mission. Its mission is to deposit the sperm of the missionary into the womb of the receptive pinned down woman, this converting the native egg inside, and crushing the native line. It’s a very positive depositing position, with the positive man on top and in control.

Stories abound from around the world of invading missionaries invading the cunts of native women in their native cuntry, often in subtle ways such as taking them on as servants or mistresses. It’s not rape really, is it ? Stories abound of children being stolen and brought up by missionary establishments, converted to Christian ways.

But the main mission of missionaries is not just to convert the minds and positively electrifying ways of life, it is to convert the blood to Christianity.

Missionaries label themselves as peaceful people doing good. Doing good God’s work. I am sure they believe in the goodness of their work. Male missionaries always seem to have wives to practise on and to give them a sort of family friendly facade.

But behind the facade of friendliness and peace, there is an invasion and conversion going on.

Once the missionaries have done their bit, and tamed and controlled the natives, and set up establishments such as schools for mind doctoring, hospitals for medical doctoring, water taps and electricity, square shaped houses, a police force, etc etc, it paves the way for the next level of invaders to move in. Eventually, when peace is fully reigning in the invaded converted country, Royalty can move into the newly built palace with full police protection.

And peace reigns over all.

The price to pay for peace seems to be forced invasion. The price to pay is The Missionary Position. And it may explain why the Church promotes only heterosexual sex.

I have seen the videos shown to 10 year olds in English schools as part of their sex education. All parents are invited to a preview. The video is a cartoon depicting a male and a female cartoon characters having Missionary Position sex. It is clinical, Satanic, functional, and there is absolutely no love. The big evil grins on their cartoon faces show how much fun it is supposed to be. Children are not only being trained to view this as normal, they are being instructed in how to do it, and that they must do it themselves.

The Satanic Mission is the Missionary Position. Keep practising.

(See also earlier posts: Cracking The Egg Code, Ab Use of Sex, King Cnut, Holy See Over Bath, Be Positive, Popule Copule, Inheritance of Paedophilia, and loads of others on sex and invasion)

Also please see two excellent recent posts about Peace on toolonginthisplace blog.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Missionary Position

  1. Claire says:

    Hello Suli
    This is a good piece on missionaries. There are many complaints now from people who were abused by missionaries as children.
    I thought missionaries stopped 100 years ago but they still exist.
    By the way, gay people can do the missionary position. You can google it, though it might be more restricted in the UK.

    • suliwebster says:

      It must be very awkward doing a gay missionary position. I dont think the bodies have been designed or evolved for it. However, it is quite possible that bodies will evolve or be designer upgraded in time so that gay missionary sex becomes more of an exact fit. Come to think of it, they might then put a SQUARE womb up the anus to go with it, so that men become the child carriers, or even so that either sex can inCUBEate a square child, and we all become the same, the new YY breed. I think that everything we are led to believe has stopped, is still happening in some form. Like slavery for example. I think there are modern day missionaries called Aid charities, and Overseas Development. Lots of caring people work in these organisations and spend time living in “developing” countries, helping to “develop” them. Of course they are not all rapists and impregnators, but they are part of the organisation that allows the rape and impregnation takeover to continue, and thereby prop it up. (As I continue to prop up the internet, I am no saint either).

      • Claire says:

        Hello again Suli
        The gay missionary position looks no more awkward than the straight one. After all, straight people can do anal sex. Usually they do it to preserve the girl’s virginity or as a form of contraception. Some people even like it, that’s why I don’t understand why homosexuals are vilified by religion (eg, Christian, Muslim) when straights can also do anal sex.
        With all this anal sex and stuff, I do wonder how some of these people stay anally continent.
        I don’t know about these Aid charities and development organisation, but it looks like Africa is being emptied. The Africans are either going to Europe or being killed by wars and horrible diseases. Maybe the charities and organisations have something to do with this as they get lots of money but nothing seems to really benefit the Africans.

      • suliwebster says:

        Yes, good point, it is homsexuality that is frowned upon, not anal sex. I am not aware of the Pope declaring anything against anal sex. Although maybe the Pope can’t really say “anal sex” in his speeches, so he says “homosexuality” as an acceptable euphemism. And we all know what he means. The same way as the word “couple” or “marriage” implies sex. Maybe anal incontinence is a problem for some in later life? I notice that many middle aged women have bladder incontinence due to pelvic floor problems, maybe that is too much ramming vaginal sex. People are secretive about their sex lives, and often lie about them, so it is hard to say how much incontinence is linked to sex. Anal sex with fertile girls is, as you say, a way of having responsibility free penetrative sex. Guaranteed baby free. The man controls the fertility by entering a different hole, without having to wear rubber, nor does he need to “trust” the woman to take pills. He simply uses the other hole. Of course another (gentler) option is to not use any hole at all, but the programming seems to be about entering holes. Maybe Africa is being cleared (“developed”) for the Roman and British Empire to move in ? It takes a while to takeover the world.

  2. Claire says:

    Hello Suli
    It’s strange the Pope cannot say anal sex when his church is very much associated with paedophilia. It also is responsible for playing a large part of wiping out people like Native Americans and tribes in South America. Heck, this current Pope is Argentinian.
    If you examine what’s going on Africa you will find that the Chinese are very active there. It makes sense because China makes everything and all the resources are in Africa. Plus the Chinese buy up land all over the world because China is very polluted from all the industry that goes on there.
    The relationship between Africans and Chinese is uneasy as the Chinese employ other Chinese rather than Africans.
    I think the Chinese fit the Roman model well. They efficiently and ruthlessly exploit Africa. Also they have no qualms in doing genetic engineering, like mixing human and animal dna, or gene editing. This ties in with your human farming article.
    I would encourage you to look into China and to see how people are treated there. It is very Roman.
    I’m not saying all the Chinese are bad, there are some wonderful people there who are doing their best in a ferocious system.
    You might want to look into how it is for Black people in China. It’s like going back in time. Hope this helps you.

    • suliwebster says:

      Thanks Claire. I agree China fits the Roman model well.
      The Chinese are probably more “advanced” development stage than us. They started a long time ago. They invented paper. And their Emperor system goes back a long way. All Emperor systems seem to be part of the one Roman style emperor system to me. In the same way that all democracies are actually installed and controlled by the same group.
      Africa is in earlier development stage, I would say, closer to source, more Earthly, hence more re-source.
      Maybe the Chinese will build the new planet (Ark) that will be launched into orbit.

      I have read some stories on China written as personal accounts, such as Wild Swans and Red Dahlia. It shows me that the human kindred spirit will never be obliterated, no matter how hard the Romans try. I have notes for a post on China, yet another queued up unpublished post.

      I am very curious about the 100 year Hong Kong experiment… Britain have been active there a long time, in full public view. I would say that Hong Kong was used as a human laboratory.
      China also destroyed Tibet.
      However there is also much ancient wisdom still held by the Chinese people, such as knowledge of Chi energy.
      I did not know there were black people in China, maybe that is something relatively new.

  3. Noo says:

    The anal sex issue is an interesting one. When I was young (1970s & 80s) it was something gay men did and if heterosexual people did do it, it wasn’t talked about. I don’t remember ever having a discussion about sex with my female friends where the subject came up … in fact it was largely outside of my awareness until about 15-20 years ago, when articles or news reports about sex started to mention it more and more. Now it seems to come across as a common heterosexual choice for the reasons already mentioned, and is included in school sex education topics as such. I can pretty much say that all my female friends around my own (middle) age that I have spoken to find it an extremely off-putting idea, not something they would ever have thought about of their own accord or that would cause them any sexual excitement to think about. Younger people, though, seem to be more accepting of it, those who have been through the education system since it began to be introduced as a sex education topic and (I would personally say) promoted as much of a part of heterosexual activity as vaginal or oral sex. I have a daughter in her late teens who has said categorically that she is not interested in it, finds the idea frankly intimidating and repellent and will never do it willingly. However, she also says that many young men of her generation apparently expect it as part of a sexual relationship and she probably won’t be able to avoid the possibility of feeling pressured into it by a partner at some point, however she might feel about it personally, so as not to lose someone she really likes to other more sexually ‘adventurous’ girls, and the female friends she speaks to about it feel exactly the same. This is worrying.

    Our homeopath has also reported treating increasing numbers of young girls for distressing anal infections caused by anal sex that they had almost invariably tried because they had been convinced by a partner that after a while vaginal and oral becomes ‘boring’ (an idea very much linked, I suspect, to the current availability of and preoccupation with, if not actual addiction to, porn). The anal passage is much thinner and more delicate than the fleshy, muscular walls of the vagina and more easily damaged and vulnerable to infection, which is something nobody really talks about.

    On the porn issue, I recently discovered that my old-fashioned concept of what porn is, is hopelessly outdated, and that in its new incarnation (over the last 15-20 years) it has become much more violent, sinister and actually mind-altering. There are various talks on YouTube by US academic Gail Dines on this, and they are an eye-opener.

    • suliwebster says:

      Thankyou Noo. What you say indicates that modern relationships are satanic practises, behind closed doors. How can this be “love” if people are coerced into unwanted bodily invasion ? People are very frightened of being single and losing their partner, especially young girls. I suspect that alcohol is frequently necessary to anaesthetise people into accepting these acts upon their body, when their body is screaming out NO. Having worked in schools, I have heard the monday morning teenage chat following the drunken weekends, and what you say backs up what I have heard. There are many other things that women do to keep their man, I hear that pubic hair removal is now an essential requirement. And vaginal cosmetic or tightening surgery is on the increase (are we any different from African FGM practise ?). This is not about things being boring, it is about control and power. I think that hair dressing, leg shaving, most clothing, all sorts of other things are part of the constant goal to attract and keep a man. Women are being pitted against each other like some sort of Olympic sport. Then what happens when the woman gets older, will she be abandoned due to her inability to meet the sexual “needs” ? Another reason to comply with sexual requirements is the desire to hold a marriage together “for the sake of the children”, that is the one that I myself got trapped in. I have come to a point whereby I believe any intimate relationship that is truly loving must not have sex as an essential requirement. Everyone must have a right of veto to any contact, and not risk losing “love” in the process. True love will respect the word NO. This is the complete opposite of the Pope’s edicts where copulation and saying YES, IS the binding force. (Popule Copule). Youngsters are being turned into sex slaves, it is killing off love. Men are increasingly been assessed by women (especially educated liberated women) in the same way, and I find it quite disgusting how many women discuss men as sex objects. I also wonder if once upon a time, vaginal sex was once considered in the same way that anal sex now is, and women were educated to go through with it to get and keep their man. Having recently explored a gentle and intimate sexual relationship without vaginal sex, I can honestly say it has opened up a whole new world of love and intimacy to me. I am also noticing that youngsters are being programmed to have many partners. I watched a government video for parents and new children at school when my eldest started there on her first day, age 11. It showed what would happen to you as you got older and how exciting it would be, working in an office, having an average of 12 sexual partners, drinking wine, wearing glamourous city clothes, going out for meals, getting home and kissing your lover (one of 12 in the sequence presumably). I think that young people, actually any people, need to feel more confident about being without a sexual partner, so they have the strength to say NO and risk the consequences. It is not a loss to lose someone who puts sexual power over another as a higher priority than love. Porn flashes up frequently on my son’s computer, which I felt I had to buy him for school use. He has been bombarded with it, ads for thai girls etc etc, since age about 11. I am researching the possible adverse effects of vaginal sex, will maybe write about that one day. I have yet to find a woman who enjoyed losing their virginity. There is some fairly dodgy stuff going on with oral sex, I hear stories of girls with massive bruising round the mouth, desperate to please the man, desperate for love.

    • suliwebster says:

      I have also noticed that sexually transmitted disease has become as routine as having a common cold, visits to “gynae” ward at hospital, visits to contraception clinics, and vaccines against cervical cancer (commonly caused by promiscuity) are all normal and acceptable. There is a council funded contraception bus in my area that tours round schools, giving out free contraception to kids from age 11.
      The book Brave New World emphasises this world of clinical sex without love.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s